Mobile Version: mobile.fairmontsentinel.com
RSS:
Fairmont Weather Forecast, MN
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified Web
Local News  News  Obituaries  Sports  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries  Blogs

New approaches needed to solve teacher shortage

Gary Andersen, Lee Smith, Christine Rupp
POSTED: September 26, 2008

One can imagine the smiles - or frowns - forming on the faces of long-time public school teachers who hear about initiatives to open up their profession to otherwise successful people who don't happen to have education degrees. To average citizens, it seems strange that an intelligent person like Bill Gates can create a Microsoft but he isn't allowed to teach in the public schools. Teachers may smile because they have actually stood in a classroom full of hyper children or obnoxious adolescents. Or frown because they have studied child development and other factors of learning that Gates has not.

We know one thing: Half of Minnesota's teachers are expected to retire in the next 20 years. With Minnesota - and Iowa - considered top states for public education, elected leaders, educators, businesses and parents worry about the trend. How to recruit, train and maintain an excellent teaching corps is an open question.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, a Republican, proposes tough requirements for college students thinking about becoming teachers, including higher scores on teacher certification tests. He also wants schools to do more to link teacher pay to teacher quality, by pegging raises to student achievement on tests.

Democrat Mindy Greiling, chairwoman of the House education committee, has her own priority: more school funding. In fact, she is probably tired of hearing herself talk about, given her unrelenting message.

We can appreciate what both of these leaders are trying to say.

Like Pawlenty, we want to see high standards for teachers. At the same time, there should be pilot programs for outsiders to enter classrooms and offer their insights. Letting in a Bill Gates to teach computer science could not only beneficial, it could save money. Local professionals might elect to spend an hour or two per day teaching at a flat rate that requires no benefits.

This could open up more funding for other school needs, including full-time staffing. Like Greiling, we understand the school finance issue. No one needs to explain it to Fairmont voters, who have seen three referendums in the past year. But Greiling isn't being economical. If she wants a massive infusion of cash into schools, she and her Democratic colleagues, who control the Legislature, need to prioritize. Find the money in the state budget by trimming. Don't expect taxpayers to bear all the burdens.

Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-1 | Post a comment
kacykacy
09-26-08 9:01 AM
I'm waiting to see one editorial that doesn't take some sort of shot at Democrats or "liberals". It would be great if the Sentinel editorial staff could muster that up.

As a 30-something with several friends who are teachers (in both public and private schools) I will say that it takes a special type of person to become a teacher. You have to really believe in what you're doing, believe that you're making a difference in the lives of those children. Monetary reward is most-likely never going to come your way. My teacher friends are extraordinary people (one an FHS grad, no less). I want extraordinary people teaching my child(ren) - not Joe Blow next door who is an engineer but drops in the school on his lunch break to teach a science class and make a few extra bucks, in turn leaving less available money to pay the full-time teachers.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
Local News  News  Obituaries  Sports  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries  Blogs